Brand | A ALSTAR |
Optical Tube Length | 17 Millimeters |
Eye Piece Lens Description | Plossl |
Objective Lens Diameter | 17 Millimeters |
Telescope Mount Description | Equatorial Mount |
Product Dimensions | 1.6″D x 1.7″W x 3″H |
Focus Type | Manual Focus |
Finderscope | Reflex |
Item Weight | 0.3 Ounces |
Compatible Devices | For1.25inch Telescope, Telescope Filters, Barlow Lens |
Alstar 1.25 Inch Plossl Telescope Eyepiece – 17mm Fully Multicoated Optical Lens for 1.25inch Astronomic Telescope and Astronomy Filters – 4 Element Plossl Design
£14.05
About this item
- 1.25 inch Telescope Eyepiece: Threaded for standard 1.25 inch astronomy filters telescopes and telescope accessories highly compatible
- Fully-Multicoated Achromatic Design: Featuring a 4-element Plossl optical design with an approximate 50-degree AFOV, perfect for broad field lunar observations; medium sized star clusters; provide a wide range of cloudy nebulas and deep sky targets
- Wide Field of View : 1.25 Inch 17 mm plossl eyepiece offers a wide field of view and long eye relief ideal for high-precision astronomical observations
- Comfortable Fold-Down Rubber Eyeguard: Equipped with a fold-down rubber eyeguard, it provides comfort during extended observation sessions while reducing external light interference for enhanced viewing
- Premium Material: Advanced materials and exquisite craftsmanship making products sturdy and long-lasting use;coming with sturdy plastic dust caps-protect the eyepiece from dust and moisture
Frequently Bought Together
£5.62
4 reviews for Alstar 1.25 Inch Plossl Telescope Eyepiece – 17mm Fully Multicoated Optical Lens for 1.25inch Astronomic Telescope and Astronomy Filters – 4 Element Plossl Design
You must be logged in to post a review.
– Destiney Rempel
I would recomend this plossl
– Agustina Koss
Good price
– Ofelia Parisian
Like
– Prof. Rachel Goodwin III
You might pay a little more for these. These do not look cheap. Fully coated. Bright Sharp image. Nicely built. I have the 12.5 mm 8 mm. Anyone just getting started in astronomy. And I’ve been doing it for quite a while. These would be my first choice. ?